Page Suggestions: Boycott TBN, Comments, Mission, TBN News, What is going on, What to do

Extravagant spending a pervasive issue for Trinity, internal review says


Page 2

"While no system is perfect and employees may not turn in 100% of their receipts, the missing receipts from 2008 to 2009 seemed to increase dramatically. For instance, during a 3 month period, one of the American Express cardholders charged items for over $60,000 and no receipts for these 57 charges were included in the documentation to the approved bill. Obviously, TBN accepts as true that these items had an ordinary and necessary ministry purpose since the charges were not disputed, but the IRS would treat them as inurring to the benefit of the purchaser considering them 'nonexempt' expenditures."

"During the course of the credit card review, we noted that Paul and Jan's vitamins, prescriptions and other medical related expenses were paid with ministry credit cards, and were not reimbursed by them. Such expenses should be included in the W-2 income for Paul and Jan and should be recorded as taxable fringe benefit.

"As in prior years, the documentation of the business use of TBN guest houses is not complete or sufficient. Given the potential for personal use on a residential property, it is imperative that the organization maintain accurate and complete logs documenting the use of these properties....We asked to view the Shiloh Ranch property .... During this tour, it came to my attention that one of the guest houses used predominately by a control party has ATV's on the property which were purchased by TBN. ATV's at a guest house generally used by control parties would likely be considered inherently personal in use and I believe the IRS would disallow them as ministry assets. I suggest that the control party purchase them from TBN at the price originally paid or that they are included in the W-2 or 1099 Misc of the control party as taxable earnings."

Guinn goes on to remind Trinity that an exempt organization must use its funds "in the most reasonable and prudent manner because of its fiduciary responsibility," and that a substantial amount of "nonexempt expenditures, or a pattern of such, may jeopardize the Church's exempt status."

It could also incur "prohibitive" taxes on excess benefits paid out.

"Areas with the greatest exposure include: Unreasonable Compensation, Personal Use of the Organization's Assets, Use of the church's credit card for personal expenses, Excessive Spending," the review concludes.

On the up side, no personal flights appeared to be listed in the flight log for the two planes in the company airline.

Trinity Says

We've been telling you how Koper accused the world's largest Christian broadcaster of unlawfully distributing charitable assets worth more than $50 million to its principals — and of firing her as its finance director, and beginning a campaign of "malicious retaliation" against her and her family, for refusing to go along with the scheme.

Trinity paints a very different picture — saying it was Koper and her husband who committed financial misdeeds. It maintains that the couple embezzled money, forged documents and misappropriated funds to the tune of some $400,000. An earlier suit on these allegations was dismissed, but a new suit revives them.

The declaration filed last week by Koper, which included Guinn's review, is currently under wraps. We at The Watchdog got hold of the records during a 24-hour window when they were public. Trinity asked that the records be sealed until a hearing can determine whether they are stolen or forgeries.

"(T)here is a Minute Order and pending seal order in the case regarding this very document – which is untrue, defamatory, and attempts to use documents that appear to be stolen. Public disclosure could violate that order," Trinity attorney May told us.

"It is nothing more than a desperate attempt by "uncle McVeigh" and his lawyer to avoid having to pay Trinity's (and all defendants) lawyer's fees and costs in defending against this contrived suit, and in filing an anti-SLAPP Motion for dismissal of the McVeigh case. The anti-SLAPP Motion made plain that, as a matter of California law, McVeigh's claim of malicious prosecution, etc., is utterly baseless and he is responsible to therefore pay the legal fees and costs of Trinity, et al. The dismissal of the case will not alter this responsibility

...(S)everal of the documents appear to have been fabricated or altered by Koper. That is a very serious concern, and until I can determine authenticity, let me properly reiterate what I have said previously: Trinity takes its financial stewardship seriously, and this is why it conducts two separate comprehensive and independent annual reviews. The first review covers all financial procedures, transactions, and record keeping in order to insure GAAP and FASB (Financial Accounting Standards Board) compliance. The second covers IRS compliance. Trinity properly responds to these audits every year."

Confused? Hold on.

McVeigh's complaint against Trinity and its lawyers — of malicious prosecution in connection with a $63,000 loan he received through Trinity companies — is one of a swirl of suits and countersuits between the parties. Tymothy MacLeod, attorney for both Koper and McVeigh, said McVeigh had indeed dismissed his complaint against Trinity in Orange County Superior Court, as May maintains, but only in an attempt to consolidate numerous suits in federal court. McVeigh's complaint will be proceeding in state court nonetheless.

More from the now-under-wraps documents, from Koper's POV, soon.


page 1 TBN News Boycott TBN